Opting for Austin Recovery from Austin Recovery Centers

Posted by on Mar 11, 2015 in Austin recovery News |

Austin recovery centers are not all rated the same. If you are looking for a reputable and effective Austin recovery then make sure you read this article so that you are able to make a more informed decision.

Drug addiction is a serious social problem that has both direct and indirect impact on the addicts and other people who are close them. To deal with menace drug rehab center Austin experts have designed various clinical and psychotherapy solutions to the addicts. The experts working in the Austin recovery centers employ high end techniques to help the addicts overcome their addiction tendencies. The rehab staff integrates clinical therapies with other drug rehabilitation components to help the addicts to attain freedom from drugs or alcohol.Austin recovery center

Components of a Drug Rehab Center Austin Program

In order to attain effective and perfect drug rehabilitation interventions, the service provider subjects holistic drug rehabilitation approach that includes the following components:

1) Creative and participatory drug rehab approach; Most of the rehab programs fails to attain their objectives. The failure is as a result of poor rehab approaches that most of the addicts finds to be hostile. For this reason, competent and experienced drug or alcohol rehab experts often takes their time to establish rapport with the addicts before the actual therapy or rehab sessions are commenced.

2) Group rehab Sessions: To ensure that the addicts have time interactive sessions, the clinicians at times opt for group sessions. These sessions are designed to bring addicts with the same experiences to have intensive interactions with each other and the rehab professionals. This approach has helped most of the addicts to overcome addiction and be rehabilitated fully.

3) Mentor rehab approach: This approach is essential for the addicts that have a belief that stopping abuse of drugs or alcohol is impossible. This component of drug rehab programs engages former drug addicts to help chronic addicts to triumph over drug addiction.

4) Detoxification: Once the addicts have stopped consumption of the drug they might require removal of the toxins that have been accumulated in the blood as a result of prolong drug usage. The addict goes through this process guided by the clinicians and in most cases need to be treated as in patients.

5) Follow up program: The addicts once they have been rehabilitated they require a well coordinated follow up program. This is essential to prevent addiction rebound. Family members, friends or workmates are incorporated to ensure that the recovered addicts is not exposed to tempting environment or subjected to stressful or situations that might make the addicts to start abusing drugs or alcohol all over again.

Opting for drug experts who have a passion and in depth comprehension of drug addiction rehabilitation plan is a smart and prudent move. It is worth spending time and money for such a unique and professional Austin recovery center.

Read More

Studies Suggest Higher Risk With EPP Mesothelioma Surgery, But Standard Chemotherapy Effective

Posted by on May 20, 2014 in Mesothelioma Surgery |

Researchers in the US and Japan have come to two conclusions that may help pleural mesothelioma patients choose the right treatment for them. One, the most invasive surgery for the cancer may indeed have significant complication risks, which might outweigh the possible benefits. Two, the standard chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin and Alimta (pemetrexed) is still the most effective drug combination to use against the cancer.

EPP Mesothelioma Surgery Carries Higher Risks

Long the subject of debate, the question of surgery to treat mesothelioma has a new study to add to the body of evidence. Considering the question of lung-sparing pleurectomy / decortification or lung-removing extrapleural pneumonectomy (the surgeries are commonly known as P/D and EPP respectively), the researchers have evidence suggesting the more radical surgery carries significant risks.

Following the outcomes after surgery of 225 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who were recorded in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-General Thoracic Database, the researchers found 130 patients had undergone P/D while 95 underwent EPP. Both patient groups were fairly similar, except that EPP patients were younger overall and more likely to have had chemotherapy before their surgery.

Overall, the more radical EPP surgery produced significantly more complications. Major morbidity, including e.g acute respiratory distress syndrome, was much higher after EPP than P/D — 8.4% of cases versus 0.8% of cases. Reintubation was similarly higher (14.7% compared with 2.3%), as was unexpected reoperation (at 9.5% for EPP compared with 1.5% for P/D) sepsis (4.2% compared with 0%) and mortality (10.5% for EPP versus 3.1% for P/D).

Considering the much higher complication rates of EPP, the researchers found that the choice of EPP independently predicted a higher rate of major morbidity and mortality in mesothelioma patients. However, they acknowledged that the level of experience a cancer treatment center had with a given surgery could play a role and suggested more study along those lines.

Which surgery a patient should choose remains a hotly debated question in the medical community. While P/D carries a lower risk, studies have repeatedly shown that EPP can provide a survival advantage in healthier mesothelioma benefits, except for those studies which have shown healthier mesothelioma patients survive better regardless of treatment type. Unfortunately, no solid resolution to this confusion has yet been found.

Standard Chemo Still Best For Pleural Mesothelioma

Japanese researchers have found the popular combination of Cisplatin with Alimta (pemetrexed) is still the most effective form of chemotherapy for mesothelioma. This comes in the wake of early studies suggesting that an alternative treatment, which combines cisplatin with Gemzar (gemcitabine), was a promising alternative.

Examining 30 pleural mesothelioma patients who had been treated between July 2002 and December 2011, 17 of which had been treated with Alimta-cisplatin and 13 with Gemzar-cisplatin, the researchers found Alimta-based treatments produced the best results overall.

Patients who were treated with Alimta-cisplatin based chemotherapy had a 35% response to treatment rate, while Gemzar-cisplatin patients saw only a 15% response to treatment. Similarly, Alimta-treated patients had a longer period until their tumors started growing again, and those treated with Alimta saw fewer serious side effects. Patients who had been treated with Gemzar survived for a shorter period of time, on average, and showed more frequent and severe serious side effects.

Disclaimer: The information in this article is for educational and informational purposes only. The content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read in this article. This article was written by a third party and its content reflects the views of the third party and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions or of Surviving Mesothelioma or Cancer Monthly.

Read More